The Rockhurst Model UN Summer Camp will provide students an opportunity to learn the basics of Model United Nations as well as learn new strategies and skills needed to improve their performance. This camp is both for students who have never participated in Model UN and also veterans who are looking to grow in the activity.
“It is impossible to know where his presidency will lead or how much damage he will do to our nation.”
If you think there is actually a real debate about the answer to this question, you should probably spend a little bit more time studying economics.
“Among mercantile fallacies were such notions as the balance of trade required to be positive in favour of exports, so that a nation could accumulate stocks of gold and silver (which the King could use to fight wars against neighbours – you can see why kings were easily converted to the nonsense!).
From this fallacy, policies of protection against imports were developed, supported by tariffs and prohibitions, even though this meant that large numbers of goods cost domestic consumers much more from higher prices (and profits) than importing them would have allowed – you can see why many ‘merchants and manufacturers’ were enthusiastic true believers in this fallacious idea, and still are!”
Smith opposed such government interventions because they held back mutually advantageous trade from which peaceful trading countries could increase the opulence of their peoples. Many of the trade items added to the long lists (which grow ever longer) of protected trade were derived, not from economic principles or national secureity but from the lobbying of legislators and the hiring of influencers (with not a little bribery) on behalf of domestic ‘merchants and manufacturers’, who profited by narrowing the supply and widening the higher-priced market for their goods.”
–Professor Gavin Kennedy, University of Edinburgh
“I know from talking to business people that no major firm wants to be a subject of a Trump tweet,” says Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. He says companies realize Trump controls the Justice Department, the Defense Department, the IRS, Treasury and regulatory agencies, and “the amount of control that intersects with what companies are doing is enormous.”
“There is no precedent for a U.S. president requiring private companies to use U.S.-made materials or equipment outside of war-time, said Dan Ikenson, director of the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies.
“First of all, this is private investment, so there’s no legal authority for the government to require a private company to use domestic materials,” he said on Thursday, prior to Trump’s comments at the retreat.
“Is it good policy to have the president dictate where U.S. companies buy their inputs? No. I think that’s terrible. I think that’s dictatorial. I think it’s very bad precedence.”
“If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage. The general industry of the country, being always in proportion to the capital which employs it, will not thereby be diminished, no more than that of the above-mentioned artificers; but only left to find out the way in which it can be employed with the greatest advantage. It is certainly not employed to the greatest advantage when it is thus directed towards an object which it can buy cheaper than it can make.”
“When our neighbours prohibit some manufacture of ours, we generally prohibit, not only the same, for that alone would seldom affect them considerably, but some other manufacture of theirs. This may no doubt give encouragement to some particular class of workmen among ourselves, and by excluding some of their rivals, may enable them to raise their price in the home-market. Those workmen, however, who suffered by our neighbors prohibition will not be benefited by ours. On the contrary, they and almost all the other classes of our citizens will thereby be obliged to pay dearer than before for certain goods. Every such law, therefore, imposes a real tax upon the whole country, not in favour of that particular class of workmen who were injured by our neighbours prohibition, but of some other class.”
“To the extent that some Americans are harmed, which is inevitable, the projected gains of future free-trade agreements should be more than enough to compensate losers, if only the government can get itself organised. Peter Petri and Michael Plummer, two economists, estimate that the TPP will boost American incomes by $131 billion, or 0.5% of GDP. That is over 100 times what America spent on trade-adjustment assistance in 2009: there is plenty of scope to do more for the losers from trade.”
Maybe we need to see the Donald’s transcripts? He sure doesn’t seem to understand how the economy works.
Next up, let’s compare Carrot Top and Satan. Whoops, they both have red hair.
What’s wrong with the news media? Here it is in a nutshell: someone actually took time to make this chart and some editor thought it was a good idea to put it on television.
Next up, let’s compare Carrot Top and Satan. Whoops, they both have red hair.
Not sure what is worse- that someone made this chart and used it in a news broadcast or that millions of lemmings saw it and thought, “so true.”
Check out @missmayn’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/missmayn/status/829590447467032577?s=09
This most recent attack in Quebec perpetrated by a white nationalist has to be the last straw. This is not the first time that a white nationalist has terrorized innocent civilians. In fact, this problem seems to be getting worse. It isn’t going to change until we start calling it what it is: “White Nationalist Terrorism” and start doing something about it.
This most recent attack in Quebec perpetrated by a white nationalist has to be the last straw. This is not the first time that a white nationalist has terrorized innocent civilians. In fact, this problem seems to be getting worse. It isn’t going to change until we start calling it what it is: “White Nationalist Terrorism” and start doing something about it. We cannot just talk it about it anymore; we have to start doing something.
One thing that we really must do is create a registry of white nationalists and white nationalist sympathizers. This really should not be too hard. We can start with known white nationalist websites like Breitbart “news” and start compiling lists of anyone that subscribes to that website and others like it. We could also include anyone who has shared a post from these websites or expressed support for them by liking them on social media. We do have the names of some prominent white nationalists like Steve Bannon, so we can start looking at people who follow him on social media or have other known associations with him. We will obviously have to remove anyone associated with white nationalism from sensitive national security posts since we cannot vouch for their loyalty given the terrorist tendencies of some white nationalist sympathizers. We do know that there are white nationalist sympathizers in the White House and various agencies of the federal government. Perhaps we could just get those people to enter their own names into the registry while they are creating it. But we will probably also have to remove them from their jobs obviously.
We will also have to ban white nationalists and people from countries with large populations of white nationalists and people from countries where white nationalists have committed acts of terrorism. After all, we must keep our people safe and some of these white nationalists are clearly terrorists. I am sure they are not all bad people but we can not really tell which ones are bad without proper vetting. Since our first priority must be to keep our citizens safe and white nationalist groups have committed acts of terrorism both within our country and outside of it, we really have no choice but to bar admittance into our country of anyone who is in any way associated with white nationalist groups. This is in addition to monitoring those who are already in the country. We should probably also look into detaining those whose association with white nationalism is so clear that the risk of violence is too great. Better to throw in a few innocent people with possible white nationalist sympathies than to risk allowing any of these white nationalist terrorists to run free in our country.
Some white nationalists will say that they should not be persecuted for their beliefs. They might argue that they have done nothing wrong other than have an unpopular opinion or express a controversial belief. But we all know that when we seek to accommodate minority opinions it just leads us down the road to political correctness where everybody’s crazy idea becomes acceptable and, frankly, we just cannot have that. We need to be united and people who support belief systems that are not held by the majority cannot be given special treatment. If these white nationalists do not like what the majority of people in this country think, they are welcome to leave whenever they wish.
And they shouldn’t be allowed to hide behind the Constitution. The language in the Constitution only applies to real Americans and white nationalists cannot be real Americans. The founding fathers were not white nationalists. Ben Franklin was an abolitionist, and other founders like John Adams and Alexander Hamilton were opposed to slavery. Thomas Jefferson, author of the “Declaration of Independence”, which included that quaint line about “all men being created equal,” had an intimate sexual relationship with an African-American woman and fathered children with her. Clearly he would not have supported white nationalism. And we know the founders did not really mean that all men were created equal when they wrote that anyway. America was supposed to be for real Americans and people who do not have real American values do not deserve the same rights as everyone else.
Plus, freedom of speech and belief is dangerous. If people are allowed to say or believe anything they want, they can incite others to violence in the name of that belief. Clearly the number of incidents in recent months and years involving white nationalists attacking, terrorizing, and killing innocent civilians has become so great that not only do the actual terrorists constitute a threat, but anyone advocating belief in white nationalism is a threat because they might provoke others to violence. And it is not like you can tell the violent ones from the non-violent ones. Seriously, all the white nationalists really look alike anyway. And the ones that look different, like Ben Carson, are even harder to identify. How can we tell which ones are the good ones and which ones are the bad ones or which ones are likely to be radicalized by excessive exposure to white nationalist propaganda?
Some white nationalists might claim that they are not all violent or terrorists and that white nationalism is a peaceful belief system. But that is just dishonest. Everyone knows that white nationalism is inherently violent. The Civil War? The KKK? Lychings? The Holocaust? And it is not like it is getting any better. We have been plagued by violence, vandalism, and terrorism perpetrated by white nationalists in recent years and, as the attack yesterday shows, there are no signs that it is going to get any better any time soon.
The smartest thing to do is to detain all of the white nationalists and people associated with white nationalism, as well as people from regions with a high propensity for white nationalism immediately until we can establish a proper vetting process for determining which ones are safe. We have to get this sorted out before we can allow people with radical beliefs and terrorist tendencies to go running around free in this country. The safety of American lives must be our highest priority and the inconvenience caused to a minority of people- citizens, immigrants, white nationalist refugees from South Africa, whatever- is a very small price to pay for providing peace of mind to the citizens of this country.